The Tin Whistle

counterculture history and conspiracy theory

The Great Gatsby Returns: Only with Hip Hop not Dixieland?

with 4 comments


Like a great comet, Gatsby returns. I probably won’t make it to the new version, though. Francis Ford Coppola made such a dreadful mess last time around, mostly due to bad casting. Sorry, but Robert Redford doesn’t succeed as “gangster with a dark past,” he’s just too squeaky-clean, plus he had zero chemistry with Mia Farrow, and she was a waif and not the voluptuous Southern Belle I always pictured as Daisy. Robert Mitchum, on the other hand, would have made a perfect Gatsby in his prime.

They call it “The Great American Novel” today but even though it sold reasonably well that first year (20,000 copies) it failed to capture a mainstream audience or much of any praise from critics. In fact, it might have disappeared but for the printing of 155,000 copies distributed free to G.I.’s during WW II. This was the secret of the book’s eventual success. Fitzgerald and Hemingway became kings of the American novel until Kerouac knocked them off the perch with his paradigm-busting insights into the hollowness of the American Dream. The novel has a mixed message because although Gatsby makes the mistake of trying to recapture the past, the narrator ends up moving back to the Midwest, giving up on his dreams of entering the upper classes. Fitzgerald, you see, went to Princeton, a poor boy from the Midwest who desperately yearned to merge into the Eastern Establishment, a project doomed because the closer he got, the more he realized the elite were nothing like him, and there was no way to become a member of their class except to be born into it.

The story is basically a melodramatic pot-boiler while the love scenes are tame and heavily cliched. As an obsessive love story, I much prefer Edmund Wilson’s little-known masterpiece The Princess with the Golden Hair, which was the first truly explicit American piece of literature, and, of course, that book was banned for years because of its graphic sexuality. Wilson pushed the boundaries and lost. It didn’t help that his novel was buried inside a collection of short stories. Maybe we’ll actually get a movie of that novel someday because it’s much more emotionally complex.

I can’t believe the disrespect accorded to the great Arnold Rothstein in Coppola’s version, where the fixer of the World Series is portrayed so crassly. Both Fitzgerald and Hemingway hated Jews and that bigotry turns up frequently in their work, although often disguised. They also had problems writing fully believable female characters, and, in fact, Gatsby has no truly sympathetic females.

Warner Brothers spent over $100 million on this version. Apparently, it runs very long and employs contemporary music. It all sounds very strange. We could have been looking at one of the biggest bombs in film history since the critics mostly hate it, but the first weekend reaped over $50 million, which means it’s a certified hit. The first film version was actually released in 1926 and has been lost, so it probably wasn’t that great (Fitzgerald hated it), although according to reviews it contained a scene where Gatsby threw $20 gold coins into his massive fountain and a gaggle of flappers jumped in to retrieve them. I wonder why no one ever includes that wonderful scene in the updates?

Written by Steven Hager

May 5, 2013 at 8:34 am

Posted in Reviews

Tagged with

4 Responses

Subscribe to comments with RSS.

  1. Hi Steven, I am following your postings because your writings really bake up a lot of nostalgia for me….just wanted to mention that many of your subjects, the people, were friends of mine: Bob Brandel (“Bird”), Cole, McNaughton, Gary P., Nancy Taylor, Chris Swing, Bugsy, Portia, Marty A., all of the band members, Scotty, …etc., etc….I was in Art school at the u, then, but I really haven’t seen many of them since…Your blog connects me and I look forward to all of your future installments……and when you see anybody from that pod, would you please tell them I said hello….?Warmly, Steven,TONY BYRNEStonybyrnes@msn.comcell 815 382 0075 Date: Sun, 5 May 2013 12:34:46 +0000 To:

    Tony Byrnes

    May 5, 2013 at 1:22 pm

    • Thanks for the feedback Tony, it’s nice to know people are listening….Some of the people who you mention also read this blog, so I am sure they will see this.

      Steven Hager

      May 5, 2013 at 7:57 pm

  2. did i already tell you about the improv theater steve simon and i did at marshall fields regarding coppola ?


    May 6, 2013 at 9:53 pm

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in: Logo

You are commenting using your account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s

%d bloggers like this: